By
Security researchers identified a malware campaign in which attackers stole digital certificates from multiple Taiwanese technology firms and used them to spread the Plead backdoor.
According to WeLiveSecurity, researchers at Slovakian IT security company ESET first detected the operation when their systems received files marked as suspicious. Each of those files were digitally signed with a valid D-Link Corporation code-signing certificate. Additional analysis uncovered that D-Link had used that same certificate to sign some of its legitimate software, leading the researchers to believe that bad actors had stolen the certificate.
They also uncovered instances of the campaign leveraging a certificate presumably stolen from Changing Information Technology Inc, another technology company based in Taiwan.
All variants of the campaign used junk code to obfuscate their malware payload. But the malware behaved the same way in all versions. It accessed an encrypted binary blob by contacting a remote server or opening it from a local disk. This blob, in turn, contained encrypted shellcode which was responsible for downloading Plead malware.
Active since at least 2012, Plead is an information theft campaign that consists of two parts: the Plead backdoor and the Drigo exfiltration tool. The former is responsible for helping attackers to harvest credentials, open a remote shell and upload files, among other functions, on an infected machine. As explained by Trend Micro, the latter is useful in terms of searching infected computers for documents and uploading any files of interest to Google Drive accounts under the bad actors’ control.
For more information about Plead, please read this analysis published by JPCERT/CC.
ESET’s researchers reached out to D-Link Corporation about the compromised certificate. Upon learning of the campaign, the Taiwanese company launched its own investigation which culminated in its decision to revoke the misused certificate on 3 July. Changing Information Technology Inc. revoked their compromised certificate a day later, though ESET observed that those responsible for the attack campaign were still using the document to sign their malware as of 9 July.
This isn’t the first time ESET has spotted attackers misusing digital certificates. Anton Cherepanov, senior malware researcher at the firm, explained in the WeLiveSecurity alert that it’s a common evasive technique employed among digital attackers.
“Misusing digital certificates is one of the many ways cybercriminals try to mask their malicious intentions – as the stolen certificates let malware appear like legitimate applications, the malware has a greater chance of sneaking past security measures without raising suspicion.”
Given the utility of certificate misuse for malefactors, it’s important that organizations take steps to protect their digital certificates. One of the ways they can do so is by investing in an automated solution that helps them monitor their encryption keys and certificates for any abnormal behavior. Gain this level of complete visibility with Venafi today.
Related posts
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur elit.
Thank you for subscription
Scroll to the bottom to accept
VENAFI CLOUD SERVICE
*** IMPORTANT ***
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE CONTINUING WITH REGISTRATION AND/OR ACTIVATION OF THE VENAFI CLOUD SERVICE (“SERVICE”).
This is a legal agreement between the end user (“You”) and Venafi, Inc. ("Venafi" or “our”). BY ACCEPTING THIS AGREEMENT, EITHER BY CLICKING A BOX INDICATING YOUR ACCEPTANCE AND/OR ACTIVATING AND USING THE VENAFI CLOUD SERVICE FOR WHICH YOU HAVE REGISTERED, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. IF YOU ARE ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF A COMPANY OR OTHER LEGAL ENTITY, YOU REPRESENT THAT YOU HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO BIND SUCH ENTITY AND ITS AFFILIATES TO THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, IN WHICH CASE THE TERMS "YOU" OR "YOUR" SHALL REFER TO SUCH ENTITY AND ITS AFFILIATES. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE SUCH AUTHORITY, OR IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, YOU MUST NOT ACCEPT THIS AGREEMENT AND MAY NOT USE THE SERVICE.
You shall not access the Service if You are Our competitor or if you are acting as a representative or agent of a competitor, except with Our prior written consent. In addition, You shall not access the Service for purposes of monitoring its availability, performance or functionality, or for any other benchmarking or competitive purposes, and you shall not perform security vulnerability assessments or penetration tests without the express written consent of Venafi.
This Agreement was last updated on April 12, 2017. It is effective between You and Venafi as of the date of Your accepting this Agreement.
The Venafi Cloud Service includes two separate services that are operated by Venafi as software as a service, each of which is separately licensed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and each of which is considered a Service under this Agreement: the Venafi Cloud Risk Assessment Service or the Venafi Cloud for DevOps Service. Your right to use either Service is dependent on the Service for which You have registered with Venafi to use.
This License is effective until terminated as set forth herein or the License Term expires and is not otherwise renewed by the parties. Venafi may terminate this Agreement and/or the License at any time with or without written notice to You if You fail to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement or if Venafi ceases to make the Service available to end users. You may terminate this Agreement at any time on written notice to Venafi. Upon any termination or expiration of this Agreement or the License, You agree to cease all use of the Service if the License is not otherwise renewed or reinstated. Upon termination, Venafi may also enforce any rights provided by law. The provisions of this Agreement that protect the proprietary rights of Venafi will continue in force after termination.
This Agreement shall be governed by, and any arbitration hereunder shall apply, the laws of the State of Utah, excluding (a) its conflicts of laws principles; (b) the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods; (c) the 1974 Convention on the Limitation Period in the International Sale of Goods; and (d) the Protocol amending the 1974 Convention, done at Vienna April 11, 1980.
In the meantime, please explore more of our solutions
In the meantime, please explore more of our solutions
This site uses cookies to offer you a better experience. If you do not want us to use cookies, please update your browser settings accordingly. Find out more on how we use cookies.