Skip to main content
banner image
venafi logo

Venafi Survey: The Negative Impact of Government Mandated Encryption Backdoors

Venafi Survey: The Negative Impact of Government Mandated Encryption Backdoors

graphic of a door slightly ajar with white light spilling out, into a completely dark foreground
March 26, 2019 | Emil Hanscom

Last December, Australia’s parliament passed legislation requiring technology businesses to create encryption backdoors within their products.

Security and privacy advocates responded with shock and disappointment, with Nate Cardozo of the Electron Frontier Foundation writing he “can see a potential dystopic future in the Land Down Under: one where only backdoored communication tools are permitted in Australia, and all other services and protocols will face government-mandated blocking and filtering.”

At this year’s RSA conference, Venafi evaluated the opinions of over 500 convention attendees on the impact of government mandated encryption backdoors and the results were quite interesting. For example, 73% of respondents believe countries with these encryption backdoors are more susceptible to nation-state attacks.

"This is not rocket science; backdoors create vulnerabilities"

“This is a tense moment for industry professionals because they know backdoors make our critical infrastructure more vulnerable,” says Kevin Bocek, vice president of security strategy and threat intelligence at Venafi. “This is not rocket science; backdoors inevitably create vulnerabilities that can be exploited by malicious actors. It’s understandable that so many security professionals are concerned because backdoors are especially appealing to hostile and abusive government agencies and more governments are considering these mandates.”

Additional findings from the survey include:

  • 69% believe countries with government-mandated encryption backdoors suffer economic disadvantages in the global marketplace as a result.
  • 70% believe governments should not be able to force technology companies to grant access to encrypted user data.
  • Only 25% believe technology companies are doing enough to protect consumers’ personal information.

Bocek concludes: “We know that attackers don’t abide by restrictions; they don’t follow the rules or buy products in controlled markets. Countries that enact these near-sighted restrictions harm law abiding businesses and court economic damage as well as intrusions focused on sovereign government processes.”


Related posts

Like this blog? We think you will love this.
Featured Blog

The (Nation) State of Cyber: 64% of Businesses Suspect They’ve Been Targeted or Impacted by Nation-State Attacks

82% believe geopolitics and cybersecurity are intrinsically linked

Read More
Subscribe to our Weekly Blog Updates!

Join thousands of other security professionals

Get top blogs delivered to your inbox every week

Subscribe Now

See Popular Tags

You might also like

TLS Machine Identity Management for Dummies

TLS Machine Identity Management for Dummies

Certificate-Related Outages Continue to Plague Organizations
White Paper

CIO Study: Certificate-Related Outages Continue to Plague Organizations

About the author

Emil Hanscom
Emil Hanscom

Emil is the Public Relations Manager at Venafi. Passionate about educating the global marketplace about infosec and machine-identity issues, they have consistently grown Venafi's global news coverage year over year.

Read Posts by Author
get-started-overlay close-overlay cross icon
get-started-overlay close-overlay cross icon

How can we help you?

Thank you!

Venafi will reach out to you within 24 hours. If you need an immediate answer please use our chat to get a live person.

In the meantime, please explore more of our solutions

Explore Solutions

learn more

Email Us a Question

learn more

Chat With Us

learn more