The Ponemon Institute and Venafi today released the UK results of the 2015 Cost of Failed Trust Report, the only research of its kind to examine the Internet system of trust. The research, which is based on interviews of over 2,300 IT security professionals, reveals that 100 percent of UK organisations have responded to multiple attacks on keys and certificates in the past two years, with 54 percent noting that the trust established by keys and certificates that is necessary for online banking, shopping, and government is in jeopardy.
Conducted in the United Kingdom, Australia, France, Germany, and the United States, the report highlights that over the next two years, the potential financial risk facing UK enterprises from attacks on keys and certificates is expected to reach at least £33 million. Research findings highlight that security professionals fear a Cryptoapocalypse-like event the most. Coined by researchers at Black Hat 2013, a Cryptoapocalypse would dwarf Heartbleed in scope, complexity, and time to remediate.
“Whether they realize it or not, every business and government relies upon cryptographic keys and digital certificates to operate. Without the trust established by keys and certificates, we’d be back to the Internet ‘stone age’ – not knowing if a website, device, or mobile application can be trusted,” said Kevin Bocek, Vice President of Security Strategy and Threat Intelligence at Venafi. “The overwhelming theme in this year’s report is that online trust is at the breaking point. And it’s no surprise. Leading researchers from FireEye, Intel, Kaspersky, and Mandiant, and many others consistently identify the misuse of key and certificates as an important part of APT and cybercriminal operations.”
With the report emphasizing that 63% percent of organisations do not know where all keys and certificates are located or how they’re being used, how can businesses have any trust in their online security? The research uncovered that attacks are becoming more widespread as the number of keys and certificates deployed on infrastructure such as web servers, network appliances, and cloud services has grown by 40% to almost 24,000 per enterprise over the past two years.
Russian cybercriminals, for instance, recently stole digital certificates from one of the top five global banks, enabling them to steal 80 million records, while another attack allowed hackers to steal data from 4.5 million healthcare patients. These are worrying figures when 60% of all surveyed respondents agreed that they need to do a better job at responding to vulnerabilities involving keys and certificates.
"With the rising tide of attacks on keys and certificates, it’s important that enterprises really understand the grave financial consequences. We couldn’t run the world’s digital economy without the system of trust they create,” said Dr. Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute. “This research is incredibly timely for IT security professionals everywhere – they need a wake up call like this to realise they can no longer place blind trust in keys and certificates that are increasingly being misused by cybercriminals.”
“Jeff Hudson, CEO, Venafi noted that this report should be seen as a red flag for security teams to recognise that the very core of their security processes is a breaking point, and the trust placed in these keys and certificates is waning. With no alternatives on the market, organisations need to prioritise the management and security of these crucial protective measures, and understand the risks associated with an attack.”
The 2015 Cost of Failed Trust Report also revealed:
To view a full copy of the report, please visit: https://www.venafi.com/Ponemon
Notes to Editors:
About the 2015 Cost of Failed Trust Report
The 2015 Cost of Failed Trust Report was completed by 2,371 IT security professionals and examines the precise financial consequences of failed trust from malicious attacks that exploit cryptographic key and certificate management failures. The research not only quantifies the cost of these trust exploits, but it also gives insight into how enterprise failures in key and certificate management open the doors to criminals. This report is the only publicly available research to track the breadth and scope of these types of attacks. For company size, 59 percent of respondents were from organizations with 5,000 or more employees. The largest verticals represented were financial services (17%), government (11%), professional services (8%), consumer products (7%), and retail (7%). This survey data was collected by the Ponemon Institute during January 2015.
About Ponemon Institute
Ponemon Institute conducts independent research and education that advances information security, data protection, privacy and responsible information management practices within businesses and governments throughout the world. Our mission is to conduct high quality, empirical studies on critical issues that affect the protection of information assets and IT infrastructure. As a member of the Council of American Survey Research Organizations (CASRO), we uphold strict data confidentiality, privacy and ethical research standards. www.ponemon.org.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur elit.
Thank you for subscription
Scroll to the bottom to accept
VENAFI CLOUD SERVICE
*** IMPORTANT ***
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE CONTINUING WITH REGISTRATION AND/OR ACTIVATION OF THE VENAFI CLOUD SERVICE (“SERVICE”).
This is a legal agreement between the end user (“You”) and Venafi, Inc. ("Venafi" or “our”). BY ACCEPTING THIS AGREEMENT, EITHER BY CLICKING A BOX INDICATING YOUR ACCEPTANCE AND/OR ACTIVATING AND USING THE VENAFI CLOUD SERVICE FOR WHICH YOU HAVE REGISTERED, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. IF YOU ARE ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF A COMPANY OR OTHER LEGAL ENTITY, YOU REPRESENT THAT YOU HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO BIND SUCH ENTITY AND ITS AFFILIATES TO THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, IN WHICH CASE THE TERMS "YOU" OR "YOUR" SHALL REFER TO SUCH ENTITY AND ITS AFFILIATES. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE SUCH AUTHORITY, OR IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, YOU MUST NOT ACCEPT THIS AGREEMENT AND MAY NOT USE THE SERVICE.
You shall not access the Service if You are Our competitor or if you are acting as a representative or agent of a competitor, except with Our prior written consent. In addition, You shall not access the Service for purposes of monitoring its availability, performance or functionality, or for any other benchmarking or competitive purposes, and you shall not perform security vulnerability assessments or penetration tests without the express written consent of Venafi.
This Agreement was last updated on April 12, 2017. It is effective between You and Venafi as of the date of Your accepting this Agreement.
The Venafi Cloud Service includes two separate services that are operated by Venafi as software as a service, each of which is separately licensed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and each of which is considered a Service under this Agreement: the Venafi Cloud Risk Assessment Service or the Venafi Cloud for DevOps Service. Your right to use either Service is dependent on the Service for which You have registered with Venafi to use.
This License is effective until terminated as set forth herein or the License Term expires and is not otherwise renewed by the parties. Venafi may terminate this Agreement and/or the License at any time with or without written notice to You if You fail to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement or if Venafi ceases to make the Service available to end users. You may terminate this Agreement at any time on written notice to Venafi. Upon any termination or expiration of this Agreement or the License, You agree to cease all use of the Service if the License is not otherwise renewed or reinstated. Upon termination, Venafi may also enforce any rights provided by law. The provisions of this Agreement that protect the proprietary rights of Venafi will continue in force after termination.
This Agreement shall be governed by, and any arbitration hereunder shall apply, the laws of the State of Utah, excluding (a) its conflicts of laws principles; (b) the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods; (c) the 1974 Convention on the Limitation Period in the International Sale of Goods; and (d) the Protocol amending the 1974 Convention, done at Vienna April 11, 1980.
In the meantime, please explore more of our solutions
In the meantime, please explore more of our solutions
This site uses cookies to offer you a better experience. If you do not want us to use cookies, please update your browser settings accordingly. Find out more on how we use cookies.