Nearly half of consumers experiencing website security alerts ignore the alert and proceed to do business on the site, putting at risk their personal and financial data, according to an online survey of U.S. Internet users released today. Nearly an equal number abandon the site immediately after seeing an alert, potentially costing businesses millions in lost transactions and brand erosion. In addition, an automated encryption certificate discovery across the Fortune 1000, performed in conjunction with the consumer survey as part of the Venafi, Inc.–commissioned "Encryption Study 2007," shows prolific problems with encryption maintenance and configuration, which is a significant cause of these confusing security alerts. As many as 14 percent of the certificates examined in the discovery were expired — nearly 70 percent more than Venafi found in 2005.
The consumer survey conducted by NSON Opinion Research and underwritten by Venafi shows 91 percent of the more than 1,000 respondents have seen a security alert, with 86 percent reporting they see them at least every few months. These alerts, designed to warn users about the authenticity of a website, appear when a website’s encryption certificate is expired, is not trusted by the browser or does not match the location of the site the user is visiting–almost always the result of poor encryption management.
"Although companies are deploying more encryption to protect consumers, they simply are not doing an adequate job of maintaining it," said Trell Rohovit, president and CEO of Venafi. "This mismanagement causes confusion, and according to our study, is a significant stumbling block for users of online services and a costly problem for organizations who rely heavily on the web to efficiently deliver services to their customers."
While alerts triggered by expired certificates are disconcerting, security alerts caused by mismatches or untrusted certificates can also be caused by someone trying to impersonate a website–such as might occur in a phishing attack. In these cases, a user could be sending their confidential data to a thief. Despite these risks, 41 percent said they ignore the alert and continue to do business on the site.
The same challenges that exist when a user interacts with a website occur when two servers interact with each other, however servers never ignore security alerts.
Citing Marc Massar, a security architect at First Data Corp., Dow Jones Newswires reported that "many business-to-business interactions are handled by software applications that will automatically cancel a transaction if a warning alert appears. There's [nobody] to say yea or nay."
Other findings of the consumer survey include:
Using its automated enterprise discovery system, Venafi collected publicly accessible SSL certificate data from 13,000 servers owned by Fortune 1000 companies with at least one server for 997 of the 1000 companies. In all, more than 5,500 certificates were discovered.
Other discovery findings include:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur elit.
Thank you for subscription
Scroll to the bottom to accept
VENAFI CLOUD SERVICE
*** IMPORTANT ***
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE CONTINUING WITH REGISTRATION AND/OR ACTIVATION OF THE VENAFI CLOUD SERVICE (“SERVICE”).
This is a legal agreement between the end user (“You”) and Venafi, Inc. ("Venafi" or “our”). BY ACCEPTING THIS AGREEMENT, EITHER BY CLICKING A BOX INDICATING YOUR ACCEPTANCE AND/OR ACTIVATING AND USING THE VENAFI CLOUD SERVICE FOR WHICH YOU HAVE REGISTERED, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. IF YOU ARE ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF A COMPANY OR OTHER LEGAL ENTITY, YOU REPRESENT THAT YOU HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO BIND SUCH ENTITY AND ITS AFFILIATES TO THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, IN WHICH CASE THE TERMS "YOU" OR "YOUR" SHALL REFER TO SUCH ENTITY AND ITS AFFILIATES. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE SUCH AUTHORITY, OR IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, YOU MUST NOT ACCEPT THIS AGREEMENT AND MAY NOT USE THE SERVICE.
You shall not access the Service if You are Our competitor or if you are acting as a representative or agent of a competitor, except with Our prior written consent. In addition, You shall not access the Service for purposes of monitoring its availability, performance or functionality, or for any other benchmarking or competitive purposes, and you shall not perform security vulnerability assessments or penetration tests without the express written consent of Venafi.
This Agreement was last updated on April 12, 2017. It is effective between You and Venafi as of the date of Your accepting this Agreement.
The Venafi Cloud Service includes two separate services that are operated by Venafi as software as a service, each of which is separately licensed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and each of which is considered a Service under this Agreement: the Venafi Cloud Risk Assessment Service or the Venafi Cloud for DevOps Service. Your right to use either Service is dependent on the Service for which You have registered with Venafi to use.
This License is effective until terminated as set forth herein or the License Term expires and is not otherwise renewed by the parties. Venafi may terminate this Agreement and/or the License at any time with or without written notice to You if You fail to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement or if Venafi ceases to make the Service available to end users. You may terminate this Agreement at any time on written notice to Venafi. Upon any termination or expiration of this Agreement or the License, You agree to cease all use of the Service if the License is not otherwise renewed or reinstated. Upon termination, Venafi may also enforce any rights provided by law. The provisions of this Agreement that protect the proprietary rights of Venafi will continue in force after termination.
This Agreement shall be governed by, and any arbitration hereunder shall apply, the laws of the State of Utah, excluding (a) its conflicts of laws principles; (b) the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods; (c) the 1974 Convention on the Limitation Period in the International Sale of Goods; and (d) the Protocol amending the 1974 Convention, done at Vienna April 11, 1980.
In the meantime, please explore more of our solutions
In the meantime, please explore more of our solutions
This site uses cookies to offer you a better experience. If you do not want us to use cookies, please update your browser settings accordingly. Find out more on how we use cookies.