Venafi Media Alert: 2017 Data Breaches Point to Weak Machine Identity Protection
December 19, 2017
To highlight the role that compromised machine identities played in the data breaches revealed in 2017, Venafi examined security incidents where large amounts of data were extracted without detection
SALT LAKE CITY, UT – December 19, 2017 – This was a banner year for mega data breaches; according to Gemalto’s Breach Level Index, over 900 data breaches occurred during the first half of 2017, which compromised 1.9 billion records. More data was stolen in the first six months of 2017 than the entirety of 2016. According to experts at security market leader Venafi, this massive exfiltration of data is a critical symptom of weak machine identity protection.
Machine identities are used to authenticate encrypted communication between machines. The cryptographic keys and digital certificates that comprise machine identities are one of the least understood and poorly protected parts of enterprise security infrastructure. Today, organizations spend over $7 billion protecting usernames and passwords, but they spend a fraction of that amount protecting machine identities.
In the aftermath of major security incidents, experts often wonder how cybercriminals were able to exfiltrate large amounts of data while remaining undetected. Compromised machine identities allow attackers to use encrypted tunnels where traffic is only sporadically inspected - an approach that permits them to evade security controls. In fact, a recent study from A10 Networks found that 41 percent of cyberattacks use encryption to evade detection.
“Organizations increasingly rely on encrypted communication between rapidly changing networks of machines for a wide range of critical business functions,” said Nick Hunter, senior technical manager for Venafi. “To protect encrypted communications between machines, it’s vital that we protect each machine’s unique identity with at least the same rigor and precision we use to protect the online identities of humans. Unfortunately, most organizations don’t have the technology or intelligence necessary to do this, and because the number of machines on enterprise networks is exploding, this problem is rapidly getting worse.”
To highlight the role that compromised machine identities played in the data breaches revealed in 2017, Venafi examined security incidents where large amounts of data were extracted without detection. Due to their massive scope and duration, it’s likely machine identities played a pivotal role in these breaches:
The Shadow Brokers Crack the NSA – Although the initial breach took place in 2016, the results of this incident were felt throughout 2017. For example, a data dump released in May revealed 300 megabytes of “cyber weapons" that allegedly originated from the NSA. In a distressing admission, Michael Morell, a former deputy and acting director of the CIA, said the NSA doesn’t know what elsethe leakers may have accessed, and, most concerning, whether the group is still actively stealing information. A key symptom of compromised machine identities is the inability to determine malicious activity inside encrypted tunnels.
Uber Data Breach Impacts Over 50 Million Users and Drivers – According to Bloomberg the orchestrators of the attack accessed a private coding site used by Uber engineers, and then used login credentials to access data from an Amazon Web Services account used by the ride-sharing company. Unfortunately, cyber attackers often abuse access to cloud services, such as Amazon AWS, to fly under the radar of other security controls.
“Effective machine identity protection requires complete visibility and continuous assessment of all identities across the extended enterprise,” continued Hunter. “Only comprehensive intelligence can drive the automated, coordinated actions that are necessary to proactively remediate machine identity weaknesses. Until more organizations have these capabilities, we will continue to see massive breaches, even among large organizations with major investments in security. The only way organizations can stem the rising tide of data loss is to automate machine identity protection.”